This video presentation explains the reasons why a Theory of Change is important for the design and evaluation of social programmes or interventions. It forms part of a collection of resources offered on the DG Murray Trust&#8217;s Growing Confidence website (<a href="http://www.dgmt-growingconfidence.co.za/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">http://www.dgmt-growingconfidence.co.za/</a>) which is a Monitoring and Evaluation resource for non-profit and public benefit organisations (especially those operating in the South African context).
<iframe loading="lazy" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/hNyaXm6OJaI" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>

This video presentation by the South African organisation DG Murray Trust, explains the reasons why a Theory of Change is important for the design and evaluation of social programmes or interventions.

Why is a Theory of Change important?

theory-of-change-for-funders2

Theory-of-change-for-funders2

In this article, the authors explain what a theory of change for funders means, and which type of theory of change is appropriate to use as a funder. The authors believe that more funders should consider developing a theory of change to work through the difference they want to make. This could help them assess whether they are working as well as they could be, and understand how to improve.
Growing numbers of charities are using theory of change as a strategy and evaluation tool. This popularity is partly a symptom of funders asking charities to provide a theory of change in their application or evaluation. But can the approach also be useful for funders themselves; and how does the tool differ in this setting?
Most funders do not have a thoroughly worked out theory of change. Many are not very strategic and have not always thought through their assumptions about how they think impact happens. Many funders have broader aims than a charity does, making a theory of change more difficult to do. This lack of a theory of change can lead to missed opportunities in the charity sector: things are not joined up, and crucial elements of what makes change happen are not funded.

Can a Theory of Change approach also be useful for funders themselves; and how does the tool differ in this setting?

Theory of Change for funders: Planning to make a difference

om-ideas-8-png

OM Ideas 8 - png

Natalie Moxham gives a personal account of facilitating a set of workshops with twelve NGOs working on sustainable forest management in Papua New Guinea. Combining techniques from Outcome Mapping with a participatory Theory of Change approach, the paper describes the process of conducting the workshops and the advantages and compromises needed in adapting the two approaches for building collaborative practice.

The paper describes the process of facilitating a set of workshops and the advantages and compromises needed in combining a ToC approach with Outcome Mapping.

Source URL

Attachments OM-Ideas-8-png.pdf